Site icon Digital Thought Disruption

Azure Local vs VMware vs Nutanix vs Hyper-V – Storage Architecture & Performance

TL;DR / Quick Summary

Modern IT environments require storage solutions that combine performance, resiliency, scalability, and seamless integration with cloud platforms. This article compares leading hyperconverged storage solutions across Azure Local, VMware vSAN, Nutanix DFS, and Hyper-V (S2D and SAN/NAS). You’ll get a breakdown of architecture, performance, protection mechanisms, and cloud connectivity to guide your infrastructure decisions.


Master Storage Comparison Table

FeatureNutanix DFS (AOS)Hyper-V + SAN/NASHyper-V + S2DVMware vSANAzure Local (S2D)
Storage TypeDistributed File SystemBlock/File via StorageHyperconverged SDSHyperconverged SDSHyperconverged SDS + Azure Backup
Pooling ModelGlobalExternal (Array-based)Cluster Shared Volume (CSV)Datastore AggregationStorage Spaces + Arc
Locality AwarenessYesNoPartialYesPartial
Native ReplicationAsync, Near-SyncArray-dependentAzure BackupvSAN RAID + vSphere RepAzure Backup/ASR
Snapshots & CloningFast Clones, SnapshotArray-dependentReFS, VSS SnapshotsvSphere SnapshotsAzure Backups, VM Snapshots
Performance ScalingLinear (scale-out)Controller-boundLimited by JBOD configScale-out with hostsLimited to HCI cluster design
Mgmt ToolPrism CentralVendor Tool or SCVMMWACvCenterAzure Portal + WAC
Cloud IntegrationNutanix ClustersNoneAzure ArcVMware CloudAzure-native, Arc-enabled
AutomationCalmPowerShellPowerShell, WACAria AutomationAzure Policy, ARM, PowerShell

Section 1: Storage Architecture

Nutanix DFS (AOS)

Hyper-V + SAN/NAS

Hyper-V + S2D

VMware vSAN

Azure Local


Section 2: Performance & Scalability

FeatureNutanix DFSSAN/NAS (Hyper-V)S2D (Hyper-V)VMware vSANAzure Local (S2D)
Scaling ModelHorizontal (node-based)Bound by controller & switch fabricCluster-based scale-up/downHost-based scale-outArc-host scale-out
CachingSSD-based tieredDepends on SAN vendorWrite cache w/ parity/mirrorNVMe + SSDSSD + ReFS cache
LatencyUltra-low (local access)Network dependentLow (with RDMA/NVMe)Low w/ vSAN configLow, hybrid-optimized
ThroughputHigh per-nodeHigh backend throughputHigh if optimizedHigh w/ hybrid or all-flashModerate to high
Management OverheadVery lowHigh (SAN zoning, tuning)MediumLow with SPBMLow – Azure-native control

Section 3: Resiliency & Data Protection

FeatureNutanix DFSSAN/NAS (Hyper-V)S2D (Hyper-V)VMware vSANAzure Local
Data ResiliencyRF2/RF3 replicationRAID from storage array2/3-way mirror/parityRAID 1/5/6 (policy)S2D + Backup
ReplicationNear-sync, AsyncArray/SAN-dependentAzure Backup, DFS-RvSphere ReplicationAzure ASR
SnapshotsPrism + Fast ClonesVSS or array snapshotsReFS SnapshotsVM-level SnapshotsAzure Backup Snapshots
DR IntegrationCalm, LeapDPM or manual scriptingAzure Site RecoverySRM + Aria OrchestrationAzure-native DR

Section 4: Management & Integration

FeatureNutanix DFSSAN/NAS (Hyper-V)S2D (Hyper-V)VMware vSANAzure Local
Management ConsolePrism CentralSCVMM or array UIWindows Admin Center (WAC)vCenterAzure Portal + Arc + WAC
Automation OptionsCalm, REST APIPowerShell + OrchestratorPowerShell + Azure PolicyAria Automation + SPBMAzure ARM, Bicep, GitOps
Cloud IntegrationNutanix Clusters (GCP/Azure)NoneAzure Backup, Azure MonitorVMware Cloud on AWS/AzureNative Azure Backup/Monitor/ASR
Monitoring & AnalyticsX-Fit, Prism ProArray-specific toolsAzure Monitor/WorkbooksAria Suite (vROps)Azure Monitor, Defender, Logs

Recommendations & Best Practices

Nutanix

Hyper-V + SAN/NAS

Hyper-V + S2D

VMware vSAN

Azure Local


Summary & Use Cases

Use CaseRecommended Platform
Distributed edge storageNutanix DFS
Centralized high-IOPS DBsSAN/NAS (Hyper-V)
Cost-efficient on-prem clustersHyper-V + S2D
vSphere-integrated enterprise storageVMware vSAN
Hybrid cloud storage with governanceAzure Local

*The thoughts and opinions in this article are mine and hold no reflect on my employer*

Exit mobile version