VCF 9.1

Protecting the Recovery Control Plane: A VCF 9.1 Management-Component Backup and Fleet DR Runbook

Published by

TL;DR Protecting workload virtual machines does not automatically protect the VMware Cloud Foundation services needed to discover, authorize, network, orchestrate, and validate their recovery. A complete VCF 9.1 recovery strategy needs several distinct mechanisms: native file-based backups for components such as SDDC Manager, vCenter Server, and NSX Manager; image-based protection for VCF Operations; backup and … Explore: Protecting the Recovery Control Plane: A VCF 9.1…

Self-Service Disaster Recovery with VCF Automation: Multi-Tenant Protection Without Losing Governance

Published by

TL;DR VCF Protection and Recovery 9.1 changes disaster recovery from a service that infrastructure administrators configure manually into a capability that organization administrators, project administrators, and authorized users can consume through VCF Automation. That does not mean every tenant should be allowed to create arbitrary replication relationships, reserve unlimited recovery capacity, or initiate a production … Explore: Self-Service Disaster Recovery with VCF Automation: Multi-Tenant Protection…

Designing a Shared VCF 9.1 Recovery Site for vSAN, VMFS, and NFS Workloads

Published by

TL;DR VCF 9.1 changes the economics and architecture of VMware disaster recovery by allowing virtual machines on vSAN, VMFS, and NFS datastores to replicate into a vSAN ESA target. It also supports fan-in designs where multiple source clusters use one centralized recovery site. The important design point is that a shared recovery site is not … Explore: Designing a Shared VCF 9.1 Recovery Site for…

From Backup to Clean Recovery: Building an On-Premises Ransomware Clean Room with VCF 9.1

Published by

TL;DR Immutable snapshots and replicated copies are necessary, but they are not a complete ransomware recovery architecture. A cyber incident changes the recovery question from “Can this workload be restored?” to “Which point is trustworthy, how can it be powered on safely, and what evidence is required before it returns to production?” VCF 9.1 with … Explore: From Backup to Clean Recovery: Building an On-Premises…

VMware Live Recovery Is Now VCF Protection and Recovery: What Changed in VCF 9.1?

Published by

TL;DR VMware Live Recovery has been renamed and integrated into VMware Cloud Foundation as VCF Protection and Recovery. The name describes a broader protection model, but it does not represent one universal backup product. The practical model has several layers: The most important design lesson is that these capabilities have different failure domains, dependencies, licenses, … Explore: VMware Live Recovery Is Now VCF Protection and…

From SRM 8.8 to VCF Protection and Recovery 9.1: How VMware Disaster Recovery Became a Platform Capability

Published by

TL;DR The path from Site Recovery Manager 8.8 to VMware Live Recovery 9.x and then VCF Protection and Recovery 9.1 is not simply a product-renaming exercise. SRM 8.8 centered on orchestrating recovery between paired sites. VMware Live Recovery expanded the boundary to include a broader disaster- and cyber-recovery portfolio, then introduced a converged appliance model. … Explore: From SRM 8.8 to VCF Protection and Recovery…

Consolidating Legacy vSphere and Older VCF onto VMware Cloud Foundation 9.1: Design Patterns, Migration Paths, and Best Practices

Published by

TL;DR Consolidating older vSphere and VMware Cloud Foundation environments onto VCF 9.1 is not one upgrade procedure. It is a portfolio decision involving four different actions: upgrading an existing VCF instance, converging suitable vSphere infrastructure into a new VCF instance, importing an existing vCenter as a workload domain, or migrating workloads into a clean VCF … Explore: Consolidating Legacy vSphere and Older VCF onto VMware…

Stay on VMware Cloud Foundation or Replatform? A CIO Decision Framework for Private Cloud Modernization

Published by

TL;DR The decision to stay on VMware Cloud Foundation or replatform should not be reduced to a licensing reaction, a hypervisor feature comparison, or a vendor preference. It is a private cloud operating-model decision involving workload compatibility, staff capability, migration risk, ecosystem dependencies, automation maturity, lifecycle economics, and future exit complexity. For many enterprises, the … Explore: Stay on VMware Cloud Foundation or Replatform? A…

Building a VCF 9.1 Upgrade Runbook: Testing, Fallback, and Readiness Gates

Published by

Scenario The VCF 9.1 upgrade path has been selected. The planning tool has been reviewed. The target version is understood. The team has a maintenance window on the calendar. That does not mean the environment is ready. A VCF 9.1 upgrade runbook needs to prove more than task order. It needs to prove that the … Explore: Building a VCF 9.1 Upgrade Runbook: Testing, Fallback,…

The VCF 9.1 Upgrade Is an Operating Model Project, Not a Patch Window

Published by

TL;DR A VCF 9.1 upgrade should not be treated like a normal maintenance window where each team updates its component, checks a dashboard, and leaves. The sequence matters. The ownership model matters. The readiness evidence matters. For VCF 9.1, VCF Operations is not a side task after the platform upgrade. Existing Aria Operations instances must … Explore: The VCF 9.1 Upgrade Is an Operating Model…

VCF 9.1 Management Services and Aria: Turning the Upgrade into an Operating Model

Published by

TL;DR VCF 9.1 changes the upgrade conversation because the management layer is no longer just a collection of adjacent appliances. VCF Operations, VCF Automation, VCF Management Services, license services, software depot, identity, logging, and lifecycle workflows become part of a more unified private cloud operating model. That means the VCF 5.2.x to 9.1 upgrade should … Explore: VCF 9.1 Management Services and Aria: Turning the…

VCF 5.2.x to 9.1: The Fleet vs Instance Ownership Model

Published by

TL;DR The VCF 5.2.x to 9.1 upgrade is not just a component upgrade. It changes how teams should think about ownership. In VCF 5.2.x, many operational responsibilities were still organized around product lanes and appliances: SDDC Manager, Aria Operations, Aria Suite Lifecycle, Aria Automation, Log Insight, Identity Manager, vCenter, NSX, and ESXi. VCF 9.1 pushes … Explore: VCF 5.2.x to 9.1: The Fleet vs Instance…

The VCF Upgrade Readiness Review: Decisions Before You Open the Planner

Published by

Quick answer: prove readiness before generating the path An upgrade path becomes actionable only when the inputs, owners, recovery boundaries, and acceptance checks are agreed. Use this review to expose unresolved decisions before the planner session. Jump to ownership, DNS readiness, recovery boundaries, scoped inventory export, or the validation checklist. Broadcom’s VCF Upgrade Planner is … Explore: The VCF Upgrade Readiness Review: Decisions Before You…

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.1 Upgrade Planning Tool: Why Customers Should Start Now

Published by

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.1 is not the kind of upgrade you should treat as a last-minute lifecycle task. For many customers, the move to VCF 9.1 is also a shift in operating model, lifecycle sequencing, management services, resource planning, and cross-team readiness. That is why the new VCF 9.1 Upgrade Planning Tool matters. VMware’s announcement … Explore: VMware Cloud Foundation 9.1 Upgrade Planning Tool: Why…